Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: XEP Support
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Partial support for XEP-0079.
      Includes a patch against r1049 to add a new hook (filter_local_packet).

      1. 449-amp.diff
        11 kB
        Badlop
      2. 449-amp.diff
        11 kB
        Badlop
      3. 449-amp.diff
        10 kB
        Badlop
      4. mod_amp.beam
        4 kB
        Tomcat
      5. mod_amp.tgz
        15 kB
        Paul Guyot
      6. mod_amp.tgz
        4 kB
        Paul Guyot
      7. patchXEP-0079-r1049.diff
        1 kB
        Paul Guyot

        Activity

        Hide
        badlop Badlop added a comment -

        if the diff files also would patch the configfile and adds the needed line to activate the mod.

        Done.

        The alert response looks like Example 15, but the from and to attributes are missing.

        Done.

        Show
        badlop Badlop added a comment - if the diff files also would patch the configfile and adds the needed line to activate the mod. Done. The alert response looks like Example 15, but the from and to attributes are missing. Done.
        Hide
        processone.10.tomcat78@spamgourmet.com Tomcat added a comment -

        Many many thanks! This enables us to use this mod the way we need it!

        The last thing I noticed is a little difference in the alert syntax. Your mod answers to a message like the example with status='alert'. In the example it says action='alert'. I'm not quit sure what syntax is correct and we can work with both, but I wanted to let you know.

        Show
        processone.10.tomcat78@spamgourmet.com Tomcat added a comment - Many many thanks! This enables us to use this mod the way we need it! The last thing I noticed is a little difference in the alert syntax. Your mod answers to a message like the example with status='alert'. In the example it says action='alert'. I'm not quit sure what syntax is correct and we can work with both, but I wanted to let you know.
        Hide
        stevenkik deadG added a comment -

        My comment is rather late. I have only the windows environment, it would be real great if anyone of you have the latest compiled beam file for mod_amp that can email to me. My email is alvis.josh@gmail.com.

        Or if you could point me a direction on how to merge the diff into the source of the mod_amp. I am quite new to erlang.

        Thanks in advance! Have a nice day!

        Show
        stevenkik deadG added a comment - My comment is rather late. I have only the windows environment, it would be real great if anyone of you have the latest compiled beam file for mod_amp that can email to me. My email is alvis.josh@gmail.com. Or if you could point me a direction on how to merge the diff into the source of the mod_amp. I am quite new to erlang. Thanks in advance! Have a nice day!
        Hide
        processone.10.tomcat78@spamgourmet.com Tomcat added a comment -

        Here is our beam file. HTH

        Show
        processone.10.tomcat78@spamgourmet.com Tomcat added a comment - Here is our beam file. HTH
        Hide
        mremond@process-one.net Mickaël Rémond added a comment -
        Show
        mremond@process-one.net Mickaël Rémond added a comment - Ticket is moved to Github: https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/issues/485

          People

          • Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            7 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development